Anti-Crypto Sen. Elizabeth Warren Changes Stance, Vows to End Crypto Debanking

Highlights:

• Warren targets debanking in crypto, pushing for stronger regulations to prevent account closures.
• Warren criticizes banks for closing accounts without explanation and disrupting payroll and rent payments.
• FDIC documents reveal pressure on crypto banking, highlighting “Chokepoint 2.0” restrictions.

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, once skeptical of digital assets, is now concentrating on investigating banks that have denied services or closed accounts of crypto-related businesses and individuals. This practice, known as debanking, has raised significant concerns within the crypto industry. During the Feb. 5 Senate Banking Committee hearing, she vowed to work with President Donald Trump on addressing debanking in the crypto sector.

Advertisement

“Debanking is a real problem,” Warren said. “This shouldn’t be happening, and we need to figure out why, and who is responsible.” She also sought to expand the scope of debanking during Wednesday’s hearing, mentioning groups such as nonprofits, the cannabis industry, formerly incarcerated individuals, and Muslim Americans.

WARREN: “So debanking is a real problem, and we need to work across the aisle to solve it.”

This is like an arson bemoaning the sudden uptick in house fires.

Don’t be fooled.

It was Elizabeth Warren and her acolytes in the Biden admin who orchestrated the debanking scandal in… pic.twitter.com/2qcsgIaSqD

— Sam Lyman (@SamLyman33) February 5, 2025

Crypto leaders seemed surprised by her questions, which largely supported their position. She asked whether they would back stronger regulations to stop banks from denying customers.

Warren Decries Unexplained Account Closures

“I don’t think for a second that you should be locked out of our banking system,” Warren told Nathan McCauley, CEO and co-founder of Anchorage Digital, during the hearing. McCauley had stated in his written testimony that the firm had been debanked. Anchorage Digital is both an institutional crypto platform and a federally chartered crypto bank.

Warren argued that banks shouldn’t close accounts without explanation, especially when the law is followed. This can disrupt payroll and rent payments.

She stated:

“In many cases, it is wrong for banks to close accounts and threaten your ability to make payroll or pay rent on time without even providing an explanation so long as you are following the law.”

Warren asked Aaron Klein from the Brookings Institution and McCauley  how the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) could stop “unfair debanking.”

In his written testimony, McCauley relied on his own experience and stories to claim that US officials were working together to debank crypto firms, referring to it as “Operation Chokepoint 2.0.” McCauley said he had spoken with dozens of crypto leaders who had faced debanking either personally or through their companies. He also believed that “regulators pressured banks to cut off services to the crypto industry.”

The Massachusetts Senator inquired about the appeals process following McCauley’s account denials and whether regulators should establish a database for debanking claims. She shifted focus to others’ debanking concerns when the Anchorage CEO brought up crypto.

The Senator’s actions come after the Trump administration shut down CFPB, a federal agency responsible for safeguarding financial sector consumers. Previously, the CFPB played a crucial role in regulating banking practices and enforcing consumer protections. After Rohit Chopra’s dismissal, the Trump administration recently named Scott Bessent, a cryptocurrency advocate, as the acting director of the CFPB. Bessent has reportedly ordered CFPB staff to suspend certain activities.

FDIC Releases Docs on Crypto Debanking

This development follows newly revealed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) documents showing that crypto-related restrictions were enforced under the previous administration. These records show the agency directed banks to limit US dollar deposit accounts for crypto firms.

Additionally, at least 24 “pause letters” were issued, advising banks to reduce or halt crypto services, citing financial stability concerns. In one instance, the FDIC required a bank to compensate customers for Bitcoin price losses despite the bank’s program not being intended to bear crypto asset price risks.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
THE FDIC JUST DID A DOCUMENT DUMP ON #OperationChokePoint2.0. Hey peeps, please dig in & let's see what we find:https://t.co/RzFvL5TYUM

PS — Scott Bessent is now officially on the FDIC board. Did he make this document release happen??? pic.twitter.com/GQpKOZg7RJ

— Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 (@CaitlinLong_) February 5, 2025

Advertisement